close
Do you like trackitt?
  • jQuery News Ticker now has support for multiple tickers per page!
  • jQuery News Ticker now has support for right-to-left languages!
  • jQuery News Ticker now has support for loading content via an RSS feed!
  • jQuery News Ticker now has an optional fade effect between items!
  • New updates have been made to jQuery News Ticker! Check below for more details!
  • jQuery News Ticker is now compatible with jQuery 1.3.2! See below for further details and for latest download.
  • Further updates to jQuery News Ticker are coming soon!

Member Profile: rajivn786 (103 posts)

Advertisement    
 
Hello, I'm rajivn786 (report this user)
I am from India
I last logged in on 10 Jan 2018
I have been a member since 06 Mar 2012
I have added 103 posts in trackitt forums
I added my last post on 15 Jan 2018
rajivn786's Immigration Cases
 
H4 EAD case: Approved in 81 days (13 days more than average)   (0 comments)
User: rajivn786 Nationality: India
Application Type:renewalService Center:Phoenix
Filing Method:paper-basedApplication Filed:30 May 2017
USCIS Received Date:02 Jun 2017USCIS Notice Date:06 Jun 2017
USCIS Receipt Number:WACRFE Received?:
RFE Received Date:Reason for RFE:
RFE Replied Date:Application Status:approved
Approval/Denial Date:19 Aug 2017Card Production Ordered:19 Aug 2017
EAD Received:Total Processing Time:81 days
Most Recent LUD:Days Elapsed:
Case Added to Tracker: 26 Jun 2017 Last Updated: 21 Aug 2017
Notes:
rajivn786's Posts
1 2 3 4 5  Next »
Posted in I-140 Forum 7 hours 47 minutes ago
Topic: DACA/HR 392 are DOA, what comes next is ...

Both legal/undocumented should be treated equally. Instead Democrats wants everything for undocumented/TPS which is a shame!! The sooner they act, we wont see such issues. Such a shame on Democrats!!
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-140 Forum on 12 Jan 2018
Topic: Feedback on IV call

Based on yesterday call I think it;s tough. Thats might be the reason for urgent Advocacy event on 4th.
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-140 Forum on 11 Jan 2018
Topic: Should I report this?

Well Said!! I wish this person instead of complaining about fake resume guy talk to her local congressman about GC backlog will benefit every one..atleast step!! But instead they want to play with some one's future!! Typical Desi S***
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-140 Forum on 11 Jan 2018
Topic: Goodlatte bill coming today - Any details ?

If u see current proposal that's rejected by Trump. this is no longer there.
It has been moved to TPS.
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-140 Forum on 11 Jan 2018
Topic: Goodlatte bill coming today - Any details ?

That will show if Yoder is as powerful as Sen Cotton, but I doubt it based on the letter he and Tulasi sent to Trump not to remove AC 21 extensions. We will know about it in IV call today.
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-140 Forum on 11 Jan 2018
Topic: Goodlatte bill coming today - Any details ?

I am already in that trance...that nothing will be there for legals.
I decided that I will have to be on H1 throughout my life.
No hope at all!!
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-140 Forum on 11 Jan 2018
Topic: Goodlatte bill coming today - Any details ?

WHy? They moved additional 50k to refugees and not to EB.
So it;s good.
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-140 Forum on 11 Jan 2018
Topic: Should I report this?

Why do u want to do that? If he is a consultant he will be gone in 6 months. Sorry what u r doing is right, but it's up to the client to do background check. If they are ok with it, what do u get..except the curse of the candidate. I would advise to concentrate on your work rather than ruining some one's career. Karma is always there ...!! You are of typical Desi Mentality!! Mind your own business will be the response u will get from your HR etc. Or else u might lose your job as well. I am not offensive but already H1's have bad name throught the world...
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-140 Forum on 11 Jan 2018
Topic: H.R. 392, Fairness for High Skilled Immigrants Act

Yes, thats partly right. Now everyone knows about this, but no one gives a damn about legal immigrants.
I did go to the congressman and got it co-sponsored. I even got a reply from Rodney Davis saying he supports.
But that stops there and no one wants to take the bill forward.
Chance of passing HR 392 is 18% as this perchingtree guesses it correctly everytime : Be it H4 EAD, AC 21 etc.
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-140 Forum on 11 Jan 2018
Topic: H.R. 392, Fairness for High Skilled Immigrants Act

This is what IV will say : Because of IV, the GC number has increased to 175k.
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-140 Forum on 10 Jan 2018
Topic: Goodlatte bill coming today - Any details ?

So it was increased by 140?

7% of 140k = 9800 to 9940?
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-140 Forum on 10 Jan 2018
Topic: Goodlatte bill coming today - Any details ?

Does this mean still country cap is there? instead it increased from ?? to 9940 per country.
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-140 Forum on 08 Jan 2018
Topic: H4 EAD Revocation rule

As of Jan 8, 2018, 3:20 PM EST, there is no court update
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-140 Forum on 05 Jan 2018
Topic: N0 HR392 in DACA Bill

As of Jan 4, 2018, 21:42 PM EST, there is no court update
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-140 Forum on 04 Jan 2018
Topic: who is right: IV or immigration girl/lawyers

It looks like 104(c) is under consideration.

(((Greg Siskind)))

Verified account

@gsiskind
2h2 hours ago
More
A very reliable source is confirming today they believe 104(c) and not 106 is under consideration. Nothing's for sure, of course, but better than what a certain advocacy group has gone out on a limb to report.

Check this website for more info.

http://www.musillo.com/2018/01/will-trump-attem...
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-140 Forum on 04 Jan 2018
Topic: H.R. 392, Fairness for High Skilled Immigrants Act

If u see all pointed to mccathydc only.
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-140 Forum on 04 Jan 2018
Topic: who is right: IV or immigration girl/lawyers

Also I reached out to my attorney (I work FT for Non -profit org) and she is not associated with any other entities :

Happy New Year to you both!

At this point, we are at wait and see. This is speculation and this will cause several lawsuits against the government. They would have to have full congress buy in and to do this would have a very negative impact on the US economy. I will keep you posted with any other news I receive about this as it is unfolding.
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-140 Forum on 04 Jan 2018
Topic: who is right: IV or immigration girl/lawyers

From twitter : Look at Greg Siskind & Cyrus Mehta conversation about this AC 21 & IV.
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-140 Forum on 04 Jan 2018
Topic: who is right: IV or immigration girl/lawyers

From twitter : Even explaining about IV

With all due respect, the analysis is wrong and I will explain why.

1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes
Reply 1 Retweet Like 5 Direct message

(((Greg Siskind)))

Verified account

@gsiskind
Jan 2
More
The analysis provided says Congress intended backlogged people use the 3 year provision instead of sect. 106. That's simply incorrect. 104(c) refers to a single one-time extension for backlogged folks.

2 replies 1 retweet 1 like
Reply 2 Retweet 1 Like 1 Direct message

(((Greg Siskind)))

Verified account

@gsiskind
Jan 2
More
In practice, USCIS has routinely granted multiple 3 year extensions. But read conservatively, it could have always been seen as a one time discretionary deal. Congress didn't intend for Indians to have to leave after three years. They were trying to give backlogged folks a break

1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Reply 1 Retweet Like 1 Direct message

(((Greg Siskind)))

Verified account

@gsiskind
Jan 2
More
And there are loads of examples of immigrants having choices of benefits. That's a big part of what I do everyday when advising clients. Consular process or adjust status in green card cases or change status in NIV matters. Choose amongst multiple non-immigrant categories.

1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Reply 1 Retweet Like Direct message

(((Greg Siskind)))

Verified account

@gsiskind
Jan 2
More
For my doctors, we can choose PERM or Physician National Interest waiver. There are many other examples. There is nothing to back up the assertion Congress wanted to exclude Indians from using Section 106. They simply gave them one extra benefit to ease the pain.

1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Reply 1 Retweet Like Direct message

(((Greg Siskind)))

Verified account

@gsiskind
Jan 2
More
Sometimes I wonder if IV attacks what @cyrusmehta and I say just because it is us saying it. In this case they need to show their work. If they're going to act like lawyers do the homework. AC21 was written not so many years ago and was devoted and marked up.

1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Reply 1 Retweet Like 1 Direct message

(((Greg Siskind)))

Verified account

@gsiskind
Jan 2
More
Document Congress intended 104(c) to be the exclusive option for Indians. If they can't they need to be careful about putting people into a panic.

1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
Reply 1 Retweet Like 4 Direct message

Cyrus Mehta


@cyrusmehta
Jan 2
More
Agreed. The analysis put forward by IV is faulty. 104(c) of AC21 is not exclusive route under which one with approved I-140 in backlogged country can get H-1B extension. One can also use 106(b) so long as the labor cert or I-140 was filed 1 year prior to final year.

5 replies 5 retweets 11 likes
Reply 5 Retweet 5 Like 11 Direct message

Cyrus Mehta


@cyrusmehta
24h24 hours ago
More
Upon further research 8 CFR 214.2(h)(13)(iii)(D)(2) and (10), the rules that implements AC 21 106(a)(b), give further support to our position that an H-1B with an approved I-140 petition can seek a 1 year H-1B extension even if eligible under 104(c)

10 replies 8 retweets 10 likes
Reply 10 Retweet 8 Like 10 Direct message

Cyrus Mehta‏
@cyrusmehta
Following Following @cyrusmehta
More
Replying to @cyrusmehta @gsiskind @brownindiannri
Rule making through notice & comment changing current 104(c) rule along with court challenges will take many months/years and by then hopefully the Trump administration will crumble under its own weight of contradictions and inequities
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-765 (EAD) Forum on 03 Jan 2018
Topic: H4-EAD , January 2 , 2018 court date.

Nope, I was just replying to the other eprson.

The court requested both parties to submit by Jan 2nd. It's up to the court to decide when they want to make the judgement not necessarily by 2nd.
I don't like this postI like this post
1 2 3 4 5  Next »